Quote from: VanDeinsberg12 on March 09, 2017, 06:36:39 AM

https://coin.dance/blocks
OMG!! i'm updating it right now and i've got suprised. Okay, let's imagine how the rogerver is laughing right now. There are less than a percent of the gap between the result of BU and SegWit.
So, BU is for real. But i've curious about how the BU it works. So, can the miners try to run a vote about the transaction fees?

Because i've heard if LN can steal the reward of the miners and it looks like terrible.

I added a Bitcoin Unlimited philosophy description to OP.

Also I find this explanation very good, also taken from BU's home page under FAQ section:

Quote from: https://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/faq

Will unlimited size blocks actually result in no fee market?

No. Intuitively you can understand this by realizing that it will take a lot longer to propagate a gigantic block across the network than a small one. Therefore a gigantic block has a higher likelihood of being "orphaned" -- that is, a competing block will be found, propagated across the network and supplant the gigantic block. In this case the miner of the gigantic block will lose the block subsidy and transaction fees. Therefore miners are incentivised by limitations in the underlying physical network to produce smaller blocks, and incentivized by transaction fees to produce larger ones.

Finding the balance between these forces is where the free market excels. As underlying physical networks improve or fees increase, miners will naturally be able to produce larger blocks. The transaction "supply" (space in a block) therefore depends directly on the fundamental capacity, rather than relying on some centralized "steering committee" to properly set maximum block size. Bitcoin is all about disintermediation, and this is another example of it working.

Bitcoin Unlimited is a vote for free markets. SegWit is like a communist centrally planned economy.