Quote from: CalabiYau Manifold on March 09, 2017, 05:09:44 PM

Quote from: Wysi on March 09, 2017, 03:06:39 PM

Facts need to be backed up with evidence.

They seem extremely competent from where I am sitting.

What makes you think they are incompetent? Please back your points up with sources.

Are you fu..ing joking now?

Evidence? Look at Lisk. Where it is and what have now, almost 1 year after ICO.

Look at dapps (ouch, there's no any, maybe in 1 year, alomst 2 years after ico... ouuuch), sidechains, sdk, new team (so many btc and Kordek don't want to spend it for very good devs... more btc for him... long long years to retire...), look at silly waiting for funds, look at market condition, popularity, silly problems with poloniex lisk deposits/withdrawals all the time.
We have only DPOS. We dont have much more than Crypti. Probably even less than crypti, look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.msg18056384#msg18056384

Here you have evidences. Very easy to see. Just open eyes and please be impartial. Look at another crypto projects like eth, dash, fct and many more, how much they are doing in 1 year (probably more in 1 month than Lisk in 1 year lol).

in 1 year Lisk did what normal project can do in 2 weeks. Please read XbladeX posts, very good: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346646.msg18056443#msg18056443

They got access ICO funds like 3 months ago. They hired and are hiring.

SDK they are rewriting. People have made apps if you bother to look.

Waiting for funds was part of the conditions.

Market price is low, but still 2x Fiat ICO price.

Eth didn't even have a functioning wallet at launch. And had monthly expenses upwards of $200K lol.

Look at all time chart of ETH. Spike, lull, moon.

We are in lull.