Quote from: Hexadecibel on March 10, 2017, 01:51:04 AM

Quote from: FiendCoin on March 10, 2017, 01:39:48 AM

Quote from: Hexadecibel on March 10, 2017, 12:59:37 AM

Quote from: shinratensei_ on March 10, 2017, 12:50:22 AM

Just less than a percent to BU for passing the SegWit.

https://coin.dance/blocks

Quote from: unamis76 on March 10, 2017, 12:41:16 AM

Quote from: FiendCoin on March 10, 2017, 12:40:41 AM

BU = Few Chinese controlling majority of hash

Can't believe anyone would be ok with that.

If that is what Satoshi wanted, guess he wasn't the genius I though he was. Too bad he's not around anymore.

So according to Bitcointalk and other discussion boards, "Core=Few Chinese controlling majority of hash" and "BU=Few Chinese controlling majority of hash".

So, Bu/SegWit = Few Chinese controlling the majority of hash. Both look same. And whatever who will be the winner the result will be same. It seems like BU will be the winner. Shocked

Core (SegWit) = a hostile take over of the network via maintaining a 1mb block limit. This was originally just an anti-spam measure. The Core developers are literally being paid by outside actors to maintain this limit and cripple bitcoin.

BU = Scaling Bitcoin On-Chain transactions as originally intended. 2nd layer solutions are still possible.

So are you saying a few elite Chinese do not control the majority of BU hash? Does this not concern you? Does Chinese centralized mining not concern you?

The only thing the Chinese have done is mine bitcoins. They're not trying to make policy. The only people doing that -in an authoritarian way- is Bitcoin Core and Blockstream.

You still didn't answer my questions.