Quote from: georgem on March 10, 2017, 05:42:45 PM

Quote from: stonehedge on March 10, 2017, 05:28:05 PM

The interesting thing will be what happens when the HLM swap happens. Will SPR keep up with the price of Helium?

Yes, it will be interesting to see.
It's not just a fork in the usual sense, it's also a philosophical fork.

Decentralization vs Centralization.
Permissionless System vs having to ask for permission

Spreadcoin and HLM will not just be different, they will be opposite to each other.
We are both talking about servicenodes, yet we mean so completely different things.

I actually hope that HLM is successful, you have my blessings..., it's just that I want it to be clearly separated from Spreadcoin.

I don't know what an "economic fork" is. I don't know what a Swap is. These are all just buzzwords.
People have already voiced very contrasting opinions about all this.
I am speaking for myself when I say that it doesn't sound like anything that I would want to take part in.

But nonetheless I am kinda glad that HLM comes into existence.
I really want to know what a lawyer has to say about trying to apply a patent on something that is already based on open source and free software,
and whether a public database (like a blockchain) can even be "copyrighted" in the usual sense.

I am not sure how far you guys are willing to go with this, but I have ordered a very large supply of popcorn.

The method for distribution will be clearly laid out as hlm's release approaches. What is clear is you will obtain equal part hlm for the spr you're holding in your wallet. Since it's not something you're wanting to take part in, I'll propose this: When hlm launches, I'll trade you 30k spr for 30k hlm. This is irrespective of each coin's valuation at launch. This will allow you not to take part in this project, and will give you a larger stake in the project you're primarily associated with. Sound good to you?