Quote from: franky1 on March 11, 2017, 05:05:19 PM

emphasis >2mb
> (UPTO) but only if 100% segwit key use to get 2mb
dont down play it that nothing needs to be done by users to attain the 2mb.. users need to move funds to new keys to attain it.

There is nothing wrong with that. Users are incentivized to start using Segwit and plenty of providers are either already ready or are 'in-progress'.

Quote from: franky1 on March 11, 2017, 05:05:19 PM

lauda compromise meaning lost, sold out, victim 'you left your password on girlfriends phone, now your funds are compromised'

No. That is just one of the meanings, see here: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/compromise

Quote from: franky1 on March 11, 2017, 05:05:19 PM

segwit is not an agreed reduced level. its a risk of screwing many over for the fortunes of the corporate elite

This is bullshit and you know it.

Quote from: franky1 on March 11, 2017, 05:05:19 PM

go on PROVE IT!! explain it

Everything is properly explained on the Bitcoin Core website. Do I really need to draw it out for you?

Quote from: franky1 on March 11, 2017, 05:05:19 PM

you can.
native keys still work after segwit activates. otherwise 16mill coins are locked and unspendable!!

Wrong. The DOS attack vector is not present at 1 MB, and you can't create a 2 MB block with native keys when Segwit is activated.

Quote from: franky1 on March 11, 2017, 05:05:19 PM

~3000 upstream full validation UPSTREAM filters.
and
3000 hodgepodge of downstream nodes that dont fully validate, may have witness may not have, may be prunned may not be.

You can blame BU for their stubbornness to implement SWSF. A lot of the very outdated nodes are irrelevant IMO, they don't properly validate some newer soft forks anyways (+ potentially have security holes as they can be very outdated, e.g. <0.10.0).