Quote from: raze182 on March 11, 2017, 09:04:51 PM

Quote from: XbladeX on March 11, 2017, 08:43:39 PM

PS: From more moral reasons I would keep away from Dash (that instamine part)

Every cryptocurrency is "instamined". Even Bitcoin is 100% owned by less than .03% of the world's population (and that's making some very generous assumptions regarding distribution). Accusations of "instamine" may have some value in the insular world of crypto politics, but on the stage of global financial markets (on which even Bitcoin is still only a minuscule blip) it's completely meaningless. If "instamines" really are an issue from an economic standpoint, then every cryptocurrency seeking adoption on a global scale is in trouble.

But in Bitcoin even big disproportions don't give you to much power directly with Dash and mastednode system and voting it cause that instamine really matters. With Dash you have fear that few guys with biggest pockets will decide where money for development goes and stuff like that.
This is main reason of danger with Dash.
In my country i look to much how "friends" of government are overpaid for delivering shit Cheesy

***
Bitcoin in that matter is much more fair only some of those population (.03%) have to put money from own biggest pocket to move BTC forward.
BTC don't tax small BTC holders for development biggest BTC holders have reasons to invest in bitcoin development.
And they have reasons to do it more efficient than DASH.
In Dash masternode system tax all Dash holders indirectly, here we have big difference between systems.

BTC system for me is more honest because I don't like community taxation this is more like in socialism.