Quote from: BetKing.io on March 13, 2017, 07:01:25 PM

Quote from: shitaifan2013 on March 13, 2017, 05:46:56 PM

Quote from: BetKing.io on March 13, 2017, 01:19:48 PM

Quote from: shitaifan2013 on March 11, 2017, 10:37:00 AM

Quote from: dooglus on March 11, 2017, 02:23:22 AM

Quote from: jpcfan on March 10, 2017, 06:05:21 PM

I would like to hear further comments from dooglus on this issue

Alex asked for people's thoughts. I posted mine, but haven't seen him reply to my post yet. I said what I thought about the situation. Basically I don't think it's right to confiscate coins that a user has trusted you with, even if he does have a history of scamming.

Maybe it's legal to confiscate his funds according to some corrupt law or other but that doesn't make it right. People trust Alex to run a decent operation. If they see him refusing to pay out winning players just because he has found a legal loophole that makes it "legal" even when those winnings were won fair and square then I suspect he may start losing some customers. I'm surprised this even needs pointing out.

wish you were right on this, however we all know how questionable behaviour turned out for dean/betking/prc. it didn't affect the site at all and with the shrinking competition I doubt Alex has to fear much for his buisness.

I also admit that seeing a bully/scammer like dzeros getting bullied himself is a little bit satisfying.

Keeping the funds is most likely morally wrong though probably legally possible under costa rican gambling law. If I were Alex I would either donate the funds or get in contact with costa rican police and simply sent them the funds with further explanation of what went down. Then give dzeros the case number/contact.

What's really funny is how dzeros always comes up with his ponzis ToS for allowing him to scam people, but rejecting the same argument made by Alex.

just my 0.05 xmr

What questionable behaviour? I had >6000 Bitcoin invested in BetKing and paid every satoshi back to investors when I closed.
There's never been a player who got their funds confiscated unfairly. I've cashed out balances over 1000 btc no problem.
If you mean because I would chat ban people? All sites do that.

There's not been a site with that kind of trust we had since Just-Dice closed.

hi there, sorry if that sounded like a cheap shot. wans't meant like that. I was referring to the sjess incident from way back which I still think could have been handled differently and the dooglus bounty "drama".

When both happenend I was sure that this would reputation wise mean more or less the end to prc/betking, but I was completely wrong. you sticked to your very own way of handling things, most people were fine with it and betking turned out to be a huge success.

I hope this clarifies my initial statement. I respect you as trustworthy member of the crypto gambling scene.

Thanks for the clarification.

The sjess situation (he won by finding a flaw in our provably fair implementation) I would handle different in terms of public drama but my result would be the same. I don't pay cheaters (I'm not going to argue the semantics of that again

).

The dooglus situation was really a misunderstanding and lack of communication. There was no offer of a bounty and he hadn't asked for one before offering the fix for the sjess bug. I should have rewarded him for it yes. I did send him a tip in the end.

Both these were from 2.5 years ago. I was still newish to the scene.
I've maybe not made the best decions at times but I think most agree I've tried to do what I thought was the right thing.

Once I relaunch there's going to be 4 years of experience to go off this time so hopefully people will see a change in the way I run things in future.

Anyway, I'll let the thread get back on topic. Sorry Alex Wink

ok maybe sjess funds should be locked but you did not give back to all the players that lost from your bug either

you and alex are both making one sided decisions