Quote from: dinofelis on March 16, 2017, 05:16:14 AM

Quote from: irukandji on March 16, 2017, 03:18:03 AM

Quote from: dopamine on March 16, 2017, 01:37:56 AM

Quote from: misterbigg on March 15, 2017, 09:57:07 PM

How do you prove that any subset of the masternodes are not controlled by the same person?

Epic fail. Can't tell him which masternode is his LOL

I don't see why that is a fail. He has a good point.

Indeed, the question is rather the opposite: as there is circumstantial evidence that at a certain point Evan Inc must have had a large fraction of the coins, and as this is amplified with the masternode PoS system, it would be rather natural that Evan Inc controls about half of the coins and an even larger percentage of masternodes (not all coins are in master nodes). As such, he also has almost full certainty to have full control over the development voting system (and the 10% budget that it has).

In other words, simply accounting for the coins he must have, unless spent a lot, he must be in total control of the community, and of about half of the master nodes at least.

This is a bit like using a Tor-bis network of which all nodes are owned by the FBI.

The problem is that nobody knows when they can just sell all and drive the price back to what it was months ago, or maybe even under that amount.

There are many investors at the moment coming in and buying as much as they can. In case this happens and turns out for Dash to be an actual scam, it would be a disaster for a lot of people. We have to be very careful about it.. I have seen tweets from important people saying that were saying a dump is incoming, it's not about if but when.