Quote from: jonald_fyookball on March 16, 2017, 04:58:07 PM

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on March 16, 2017, 04:14:16 PM

Why Bitcoin Unlimited should be correctly classified as an attempted robbery of Bitcoin, not a fork

https://medium.com/@Coinosphere/why-bitcoin-unlimited-should-be-correctly-classified-as-an-attempted-robbery-of-bitcoin-not-a-9355d075763c#.r5f6ui934

An excellent article that describes how trying to overtake the name of a project via hard fork is unheard of and nonsense.

Looks like BUcoiners can't accept if they fork they will be an altcoin.

so anything not Blockstream/core is 'overtaking' the project? And we should ignore Satoshi's clear statement in the whitepaper that nodes can vote on rules with their processing power?

The only 'trying to overtake via hard fork' is the backdoor UASF , which is probably the brainchild of Greg Maxwell.

I think the miner will vote with their hashing power. That is more fair than the so called UASF.