Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB)
by
Lauda
on 18/03/2017, 15:29:52 UTC
That version didn't gather much support if any. Bitcoin scales very inefficiently on the first layer, that's why it requires a secondary layer.
This is why I propose to use BOTH SegWit and Adaptive Block Size (Bitcoin ABS? XD )
I think only the following client implementations make sense for *compromise*, *consensus* or whatever:
Core: Segwit
Bitpay: SegWit + Adapative Block size - although I don't know how resistant it is to being gamed.
BitcoinEC: SegWit + Emergent Consensus - Already *praised* by ViaBTC (see here: https://twitter.com/ViaBTC/status/842748341767290880) [1].

[1] - Client not released yet.