Quote from: Spoetnik on March 18, 2017, 05:12:13 PM

I love how you make assumptions then parade them around as fact.
If i was setting up a Ransomware last little while i would probably be looking at Monero simply because the price is / was more positioned to go up than DASH that already peaked.

Because you think these guys KEEP it to "invest" ?? Grin

DASH didn't "peek". It will go to the moon. Being centralized, it is the perfect crypto for "investors".

Quote

Your a fervent rabid maniacal Monero shill.
You only ever comment to defend Monero.. usually by proxy for maximum deniability plausibility.
AKA: you do it all clever & shit so you can play dumb about it.
Look around ..you showed up here on this topic didn't you ?
Ding ding ding Monero topic.. out comes Dino with the usual bullshit.

What bullshit ? That monero is about the only seriously anon coin with some volume (so that you can hide inside) ? ZEC has also quite good anon crypto, but the fact that it is not compulsory is maybe a problem. But I have to admit that now that the anon part went up from 6% to 29% makes it look more attractive as a respectable crypto coin. It should have been 100%, but that's a fundamental error that the ZEC people made, but if the anon fraction remains high enough, it may be one of the other coins I technologically like. It being a corporate coin makes me dislike it on that side, but I do appreciate the crypto part of it.

Quote

And look around you are being led around like a horse and yeah you were off-topic.. you hijacked it with an anon debate.

I didn't. It is quite obvious that monero was picked by these people for the anon side. Because it is a true crypto currency application, to ask for ransoms. (whether ransomware or other ransoms). Might be a niche for kidnapping too. THAT is the true nature of crypto, and if you still don't get it, you'll never get it.

Quote

Yet again as you have done lots last few months.
Kinda funny you showed up not long ago and have been pounding this place with anti-law monero bullshit.
I don't recall seeing you all along with me here commenting the last 4 straight years.

Because anti-law is the only serious niche for crypto. All other applications are not going to work out, because centralized systems are better at it. What's the basis of crypto ? Trustless ; decentralized. Why do you need that ? To not have single points of failure by mighty enemies. What enemies ? Violence monopolists. Because if not, you can make a deal with the violence monopolist to protect your single point of failure by law and by police. So the only way to NEED a trustless decentralized system is if you have to fight the violence monopolist. Otherwise, it is wasted effort.

Quote

I love how you bend over backwards here ignoring 99.99% of everything i ever say then make arguments over unrelated bullshit like a fucking contrarian.

I can say that of you too. I'm stating that crypto is a useless exercise if it is to be legal/law abiding/regulated. Any centralized system with legal protection will be better.

Quote

Your incessant anti-law campaign here is tiring.. start your own topics maybe instead of spamming mine.

Because it is the only thing that makes sense in crypto. And who started a topic about an anon coin and something illegal ? Isn't this what this thread is about ? I just say that this is a perfectly right application of crypto. Not more, not less. That's what crypto is made for. Even though most idiots in crypto don't understand it and think that it is a replacement for VISA.

If crypto can't work for this kind of niche, then crypto is entirely useless.