Quote from: Spoetnik on March 19, 2017, 10:51:02 PM

Did some poking around and i think it's possible the OP here posted simply so the first poster could advertise his ICO.
Vito Corleone (Junior account) posted then 5 minutes later another Junior account posted first suggesting the CurrenSky ICO.
Both seem to have weak English and Vito said he'd from the Netherlands.
The ICO coin has a lot of ties to that area of Europe too.

Looking at both their full post history i see a lot of reoccurring weird broken English.
The first thing i seen looking at the the ICO was problems about refusing to use an escrow for it.
Then i of course seen the site whois was protected by good ole Scotsdale (like 90% of coins)

Noobs galore + Noob ICO + probably sock-puppet account shenanigans.

Hello Spoetnik,

We are not linked at all with the other account.
On the other hand we understand people to be suspicious about our concept and this post.

The team of CurrenSky is full of non native english speakers, we are sorry if our english isn't perfect.
We cannot use an escrow system, we explained many times why : This is backed up by real estate and we CANNOT launch it if we don't have the real estate backup.

Feel free to ask any question as long as we can answer, we will.

Thanks

Quote from: klaaas on March 19, 2017, 10:55:54 PM

A more stable altcoin.... no way.

Hello klaaas,

CurrenSky will be backed up by international real estate.
The goal is to make its value the most stable on the market and in addition, create a financial interests for all of its users (thanks to rentings).
For more information, do not hesitate to visit our page and our annoucement.

Thanks

Quote from: Spoetnik on March 20, 2017, 04:20:02 AM

Quote from: klaaas on March 19, 2017, 10:55:54 PM

A more stable altcoin.... no way.

Ya that made me suspicious earlier.
Both the OP and then the currensky guy used that word.
And what do they mean anyway ? code or market price ?
If price LTC is pretty damn stable LOL Grin

Dear Spoetnik,

You can find more information in our pseudo-white paper.
But in a few words it is made to be more stable on :
-The value (no or very low volatility)
-The network hashrate(/attack probability)
-The growth (no exponential move is possible)

But to really understand the main aspects, please dig more in our post, the website and the pseudo-white paper.

Many thanks for your understandings and sorry for taking that long to answer.

PS : We answered fastly to this thread at first because Anthony (Founder of our project) is using a mobile app called "ZeroBlock", he saw the post and we managed to answer to it.