Quote from: m140v on March 22, 2017, 02:43:30 AM

Quote from: jakehdchoi on March 21, 2017, 05:57:27 AM

Quote from: imjustsayintho on March 18, 2017, 05:36:56 PM

Quote from: jakehdchoi on March 18, 2017, 01:32:09 PM

Quote from: imjustsayintho on March 18, 2017, 05:17:50 AM

How does future scalability for your blockchain work?

Could you clarify your question, please? I'm assuming you are asking about the decision making process, but just wanted to make sure if I get it right.

I wondering if BOS will face the same issues as BTC in the future, issues over the blockchain scaling to handle transactions?

It's all about making a decision that people agree. To reach that goal, node operators should be able to discuss an issue and agree on one decision. BOScoin has the Congress system where people can make decisions with certain rules. People will be trained as they are making more decisions and we believe that the Congress will eventually be able to handle all problems and issues including scaling the blockchain.

Based off the whitepaper, the Congress system seems like a good way to avoid a lot of the chaos that tends to surround cryptocurrency management. Decisions effect multiple levels of the blockchain, from the scaling to the transactions themselves. It seems like it will be an extremely powerful system. Likewise, as I stated above, it seems to add the capability to truly create communities around BOScoin that have direct influence on the chain.

There are incentives for nodes to operate in the best interest of the system. However, according to the whitepaper these incentives can be changed as well which means BOScoin has a shifting game theory that I don't think we've seen ever. Also seems like a more organic solution than miner fees for insuring the lifespan of the system. I was wondering if the system has a 'benevolent dictator' that can overrule a decision or is the congress truly democratic? Secondly, do people believe that one or the other is superior? We can vote on that... Grin

For your first question, there will not be any kind of dictator that can overrule the trust contract. If so, the contract will not be trusted. Once a decision is made, the decision is made.

And for your second question, I don't quite get what you are asking. Could you clarify your question, please?