Quote from: iamnotback on March 22, 2017, 11:24:56 AM

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 22, 2017, 03:39:42 AM

Quote from: kelsey on March 22, 2017, 03:24:40 AM

Quote from: iamnotback on March 22, 2017, 03:21:57 AM

Quote from: kelsey on March 22, 2017, 03:15:28 AM

Quote from: iamnotback on March 22, 2017, 02:05:57 AM

It is a clusterfuck. I bought ETH. LTC and XMR are other options.

ETH forking history is kinda worse though Undecided

At least the attacker fork failed.

hard to know which one was the attacker fork Shocked

right i was just ganna say "ehhhh ya attackers won out in the end" lol

For a moment I got confused and I thought you were referring to which of BTU or BTC is the attacker fork. Cheesy

I was on the side of Bruce Wanker and immutable protocols too back then. Tongue

Roger Ver shorted BTC by getting into bed with Dash right before BU attack began. Then we have the Chinese mining cartel ostensibly leveraging electricity paid for by Communism attacking to maintain their hegemony of mining $1000 tokens for $50 in costs. And on the other side, we have the banksters who want to be able to get the bulk of transactions delegated to centralized hubs on Lightning Networks and Bitcoin onchain will become exclusive for them to use (only for very high valued transactions).

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 22, 2017, 06:32:00 AM

cooperation.
comprimise!
sanity!?
Bahahahahahaha!

no.

i think 90% of users and just everyone in general would want some kind of cooperation, comprimise, and sanity.
but i could be wrong.
in anycase, it doesn't seem likely

It is really easy to see that we the token hodlers are caught in the middle of a fight between Godzilla and King Kong. Because PoW is not decentralization!

Core tries to make it seem like they are the more rational ones with the softfork, bug fixes, enabling LN, etc.. but their agenda is clear if you really step back and compare who is fighting and the reason they can't compromise.