Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] HEAT: 3.0 crypto*multisig fiat*a2a hft*1000tps*DSA*PoS+PoP*e2ee chat*
by
StewieG
on 23/03/2017, 17:54:10 UTC
@EliphazFimk Now that we can communicate better , could you point which accounts made those assets ? Are those funds withdrawn or are they still in the exchange ? I guess that you have to give at least the identity of the person/s who made those assets and give us the opportunity to give neg trust . HEAT must protect it's investors in any possible way .

We have no more information than you have available, nor do we have access to the asset concerned.

Issuer can be seen by clicking on the asset pair and landing here:
https://heatwallet.com/#/trader/0/4249904286321844153

You can use the API to track payments / trades to and from that account
https://heatwallet.com/api/

There seem to be a couple of BTC redemptions from that account
https://heatwallet.com:7734/api/v1/account/payments/14601113921039187075/all/timestamp/false/0/100

Our BTC gateway handles BTC deposits and redemptions, we don't currently have the resources nor the inclination to operate as an escrow for other assets or general investigator of asset issuers' business.

Quote
opportunity to give neg trust
Feedback mechanism on assets is planned but not yet available.

However I don't necessarily see what would the neg trust be about? Has the asset issuer promised something? Has the mistaken buyer contacted the issuer for resolving the issue of him not finding out enough data or even the issuer account number of the asset before buying it? Things like that in a decentralized environment are to be handled by the parties affected and not the infrastructure supplier (us). Crypto platforms are all about giving full power of tokens to the counterparties in transaction. It's unfortunately a known fact many people don't understand that and aren't willing to take full responsibility of their actions regarding their funds, thus try to still resort to some authority figures they perceive would have power to settle their errors, whereas in reality this isn't possible in a decentralized system.

The asset issuer responded to our questions about the purpose of his assets, so I'd suppose there's good chance contacting him would be fruitful. HEAT mainnet supports private messages to account number.

@EliphazFimk So the account is 14601113921039187075 . Is this an ICO account or it is an account created after launch . In case it is an ICO account can you share who was the buyer ( bitcointalk account ) ? I don't remember what was the process for claiming HEAT and if the above is possible , but if that's the case this will be a way of pressure to the asset creator to return funds to the buyer .
@StewieG Probably you are in his ignore list , i agree that he owe you at least an apology .
I think the ones guilty are the heat heads. They did not describe how the asset exchange works nor did they explain that you don't buy real komodo. The guy who created the market did nothing wrong, he just used the functionality provided by the heat crap. It is the responsibility of the heat heads to make sure people know what they are doing on the exchange. They should refund the man his btc or komodo or whatever. But we all know what greedy smelly bitches the heatheads are!

Just sold my 3k heat to irukandji. He is a trustworthy guy(too good to be involved in the heat community), we didn't even need a escrow. Now I only need my 0.17btc back and I can finally move on....
Hi StewieG, nice that you got your 0.17btc paid out and sold the rest of your heat to irukandji. I think now you can finally move on. Send us a message if you find a new project to follow. Could be quite fun to read your posts in a new thread  Smiley

Oh dude you are so wrong if you think I will move on just because I received my btc back! I told these assholes that I want an apology! They will have me dicking around here for as long as this piece of horseshit called heat exists if they don't apologize to me! I am not asking much here! Angry