Quote from: gentlemand on March 23, 2017, 06:23:29 PM

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on March 23, 2017, 06:15:51 PM

What do you think spreading it will mean? Just a bunch of bots automatically dumping, you know the drill. You've been around long enough, you know what happens if it was to be given out especially at these prices. I rather have it held in a community fund for future development and expansion.

Um, isn't that exactly what I'm saying?

Some choice quotes from a few cm above.

Quote from: gentlemand on March 23, 2017, 03:10:57 PM

Was there ever an actual statement about plans for this?

Anyway, my position hasn't changed. Initial stakeholders did very well. I don't think they need any more money. What's left over should be going towards benefiting NEM as a whole.

Quote from: gentlemand on March 23, 2017, 03:42:21 PM

I do not want to receive extra funds from the silver coin thing anyway. It should be for the greater good.

How did your position not change when you were at one point calling for free distribution of coins?

Quote from: gentlemand on February 03, 2017, 09:03:47 PM

People who failed to redeem coming out of the woodwork again. People who don't have access to their stake address any more having a moan.

I don't think it sends a very forward looking message but I certainly wouldn't object all the same. Original stakeholders should be legends of the past.

and

Quote from: gentlemand on February 05, 2017, 03:17:37 AM

I really don't see why original stakeholders should be pandered to in any way whatsoever. They've either blown it or reaped the rewards already. It would make NEM look like a closed shop to benefit a small inner circle. It would be like Satoshi handing out his stash to the handful of cpu miners while everyone else looks on in disgust.

If there is a gesture to be made with those funds then it should be an inclusive one.

You kept pushing to give it out for free. You made those statements and now are flip floping. Roll Eyes