Quote from: jonald_fyookball on March 23, 2017, 08:03:44 PM

~
yeah, so do we:
A) increase the blocksize so the spammers have to do WAY more transactions, making it more expensive for the spammers, while simultaneously increasing bandwidth for everyone
or
B) keep the blocksize and just increase the fees so its more expensive for everyone to transaction, while not increasing bandwidth for anyone
Answer should be pretty clear.

first of all you are just trying to make this topic into another one of "those" topics Cheesy

also the answer is apparently not clear or we have switched already Wink

but seriously, how much are you going to increase the size. 500 byte? 1000? 5000? and what will you do when fees came down and spam attack became easier? fees are 220ish s/b if it goes down to say 50 that means 1 spam tx turns into 4-5 txs and you successfully quadrippled the spam attack with the fork

nobody is more mad of the high fees than i and i am all for a block size increase though, i think 1 MB is reaching (not reached) its end but it can not be done without a proper plan. so far this spam is being used as a weapon to pretend we need fork(s).

Quote from: European Central Bank on March 24, 2017, 12:13:17 AM

well, maybe i was paying too much but all of my transactions absolutely flew today.

we have been going back and forth with the spam size.