Quote from: cellard on March 25, 2017, 03:35:46 AM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on March 24, 2017, 07:43:52 PM

Quote from: zyzzbrah on March 24, 2017, 07:35:35 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on March 24, 2017, 06:17:02 PM

OP, you are spinning this and putting words in Peter's mouth.

What he said is when the mining reward goes to 0 (in the year 2140),, its unclear what happens with the natural fee market.

No one in the BU camp is saying "we need to change the social contract and have more than 21M coins" which is what
you are implying.

Bitcoin will have a non-zero inflation rate for the next 120 years. And we could always decide to re-introduce the protocol enforced limit at that time if no other solution
is available.

protocols solidify with time, pretty sure 120 years from now the protocol rules are set in stone otherwise bitcoin would be a failure as a store of wealth

this implies exactly what it implies. anything but certain 21 million limit coin is untolerable.

Agree. Something else will have to be done in 120 years about the blocksize/fees.

Again, too stupid to realize how psychology works when investing.
The whole trust in bitcoin as a solid store of wealth is destroyed by the very second BUcoin takes over with his EC abomination.

Do you have an actual argument of substance against EC, other than hurling insults ('too stupid') and hyperboles ('abomination')?

How will it destroy trust? All it does is allow miners to freely decide what size blocks should be on the blockchain. That's literally
the only property of Bitcoin that it affects.