Quote from: oktana on March 25, 2017, 04:27:24 PM

Quote from: bientang on March 25, 2017, 02:21:34 PM

Quote from: Vinaa77 on March 19, 2017, 02:08:54 PM

Quote from: BlackPanda on March 19, 2017, 01:50:49 PM

Quote from: dimox on March 19, 2017, 12:31:21 AM

sepertinya hardfork kurang bagus menurut ane..
liat koin sebelum"nya yg d hardfork pasti ada plus minusnya..
sekarang masih wacana aja dah turun harga btc

dengan adanya bitcoin unlimited tentunya ini akan pasti menyebabkan harga bitcoin menurun . bayangkan saja bitcoin yang kita miliki sekarang kedepannya hanya memiliki harga yang rendah . tentu akan banyak orang yang menentang hal ini .

Tapi kalau hal ini justru membuat kerugian kenapa 20 exchange tersebut bersedia menerimanya ya gan?. Jadi was was beli btc di rate skrg

Ya karena pada dasarnya exchanger menerima segala coin gan. Mereka kan mencari keuntungan dari transaksi yang ada, jadi mau coin apapun asalkan menguntungkan pasti mereka terima. Karena mereka hanya bertugas sebagai exchanger

Hardfork hampir tidak terbendung karena fans setianya yang banyak mas, untuk thread lokal aku belum menemukan user yang pro, hampir semuanya kontra. exchanges juga bersifat main aman, mending membuka slot daripada ketinggalan market lain. Permainan volume adalah kuncinya, siapa cepat dia dapat karena ini adalah fenomena dari dulu dan hanya masalah bom waktu. Serendah2 bitcoin tidak akan serendah altenative coin, justru altcoin nanti juga akan memiliki tolak ukur baru 2 bitcoin yang berbeda. Penurunan harga signifikan=kepemilikian bitcoin yang lebih merata.

egk tolak ukurnya tetep btc, btu cuman jadi altcoin Grin

contoh eth saat pecah jadi etc apakah tolak ukurnya jadi 2?
di poloniex tetep aja eth yg jadi tolak ukur, etcnya ngejeblog baru naek lagi dah akhir2 ini

harga btc jeblok sebabnya siapa coba??
https://i.redd.it/cbe4k96swjny.jpg

quote dari cryptolution @reddit

Quote

Bitcoin is not a centralized service like eBay. When they are competing for market share they can make listings for free because they are generating Revenue off of advertisement or they are doing it as a loss leader to gain market share so that they then can raise fees on their vendors at a later time once they have monopolized the industry. They will recoup costs and to think otherwise is naive.
This cannot happen with Bitcoin. The resources that cost individuals money to host the blockchain and propagate transactions and to validate blocks cannot just be magically taken away. There is no Central Authority that controls them to give them money to compensate them for their lost leader like Behavior. Miners are only one part of the picture.
All this does is further demonstrate that Jihan clearly doesn't understand how Bitcoin works in the business world. He may be used to running businesses based on centralized decision-making models which is why he would so greatly advocate for BU which will cause Bitcoin to be turned into a centralized decision making model.
He has clearly demonstrated that he does not understand the complexity of the cost-benefit relationship of transactions and Resource Management in a decentralized system.
Thanks so is mediocracy. This is appointing the least qualified person to make management decisions. Thanks so is like saying "he is a successful businessman. He will run things better!"
But bitcoin, like government, is not a business. It's a decentralized network that requires complex tradeoffs to work. There is no dictator that gets to make rules. Someone who is used to throwing his ego around to get shit done is the least effective person for the job.
Jihan is clearly on a Jihad to destroy Bitcoin.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/61epnp/jihan_wu_endorses_95_consensus_and_compromise/