Quote from: stormia on March 27, 2017, 06:10:02 AM

Quote from: stackoverflow on March 27, 2017, 06:07:43 AM

Quote from: stormia on March 27, 2017, 06:03:06 AM

Quote from: stackoverflow on March 27, 2017, 05:46:08 AM

Quote from: stormia on March 27, 2017, 04:54:44 AM

Quote from: stackoverflow on March 27, 2017, 03:52:21 AM

Ok I'm sick of arguing with a bunch of clowns who think they are smart Grin

This forum has turned into a landfill of incompetent trolls! do your worst.

Oh wait you already did Grin

These are your own words bud, so if you are arguing against them you are arguing against yourself: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"

Quote from: stackoverflow on March 26, 2017, 08:11:27 PM

"the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"

I don't think I am smart, those are your own words- you're the smart one! Wink

Unless you are arguing against yourself, in which case that isn't very smart...

I'm just ecstatic that you finally agree that the burden of proof is on qtum who has declared they raised over 15 milion USD but provided absolutely zero proof to support that. And that the burden does not lie on me since I am simply denying that claim. This means you are going to help me pressure them for this proof, right? Really looking forward to you asking qtum to provide the proof now that you admit it is their responsibility! Glad you are on our side for once!

Or do you want to admit you are a lying hypocrite? Which will it be?

You can't weasel your way out this time, those are your own goddamn words.

I was referring to your accusation that this project is a scam, the burden of proof for this is on you!

As for the funds, the exchanges have collected them, that's proof enough for me. Now if you accuse these exchanges of being in bed with the team and falsifying information, you know what you need to do: provide proof.

I think it's useless at this point to try and discuss with you, it seems paranoia have gotten the best of you.

Thanks for admitting you are a lying hypocrite. You can't apply your logic of "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" only when it suits you but not when it doesn't. That makes you a hypocrite, plain and simple. No matter how hard you try you can't deny it, those are your own words. And again, they are the ones declaring a successful ICO, I am denying that. So according to your own statement they are the ones that bear the burden of proof.

The problem with you is you want to pick what proof you want, and only accept that. This is not how it works!

Success of the ICO have been confirmed by exchanges data, you cannot deny that.

LOL show me the "data" you speak of. There is only one type of data that can serve as evidence and that is the data on the blockchain. That is exactly what I am asking for, the data- the addresses which show proof of the funds. It's so simple. Just how dumb are you? How dumb do you think observers to this thread are?

Name calling again? Grin

That's all you got!