Quote from: Gandalf86 on March 27, 2017, 07:42:25 PM

Quote from: Alteredcoins on March 27, 2017, 02:35:26 PM

Quote from: Gandalf86 on March 27, 2017, 12:36:11 PM

Quote from: Alteredcoins on March 27, 2017, 10:36:25 AM

The website and graphics of anything are an expression of pride.

What is actually an expression of pride is to not have the Windows wallet crashing on exit. To deliver on promised milestones (beta App release). Having a fancy website is an expression of superficiality and trying to convince people of something that doesn't even exist yet. "Under-advertise, over-deliver" has been a very successful receipt in the past. A website is advertisement, the software is the product that matters. Have a working product first, and advertise it when it works.

First impressions are important and this keeps coming up in a negative light. Is that meaningless to you as an investor? People see a clunky-ass site and they immediately suspect a clunky-ass coin. Investors should hope they'd get somebody on this cosmetic issue while they deal with the windows issue that first came up in November/December. If nothing apparent is happening with the code, the appearance of momentum is very helpful. I don't get your logic.

Let me explain to you my logic. As an investor, a bad first impression or bad presentation is attractive to me! Because it increases the probability of a coin being undervalued. I have a good history of success following that logic. This is probably some of of the most high-profile advice you will find on this forum: Look for projects that have good fundamentals, and bad presentation (or bad marketing, bad reputation etc.).

The point is, yes, the price will be lower when the first impression is not right. But the market will correct eventually as the presentation problems will be solved eventually, assuming that the project itself is promising. If you're a serious investor who is thinking long term, it doesn't matter to you whether problems like these will be fixed in one month or 1 year, as long as you were able to get in before the price rises.

I already bought in, so I'm just here to wait until the price is at the moon, and I don't care when that will be.

Quote from: mandica on March 27, 2017, 04:32:32 PM

We can not afford to hire graphic designers and we have to grow this organically and slowly.

And when I'm reading something like this, it gives me a wet dream because it is a very positive indicator that the project will be successful eventually. Wink

I also have a very good history of picking coins. What matters most is determination for success on the part of the developers, and supporting team members.

You would have to be somewhat naive to think this isn't a long-shot, but that is one of the fun/interesting/exciting aspects of crypto investments.

In my mind the loss of SDC left a huge space to fill, and I strongly believe the best coin to do that is Spectre.

This project is still VERY young, so any perceived imperfections at this point are irrelevant. All that matters is a strong will to resolve them, and perfect the excellence of the underlying code.

Most coins take at least a couple years to mature, and develop a strong following. A hefty market cap usually follows, and I think it is a very good sign that we already have a fairly solid price and market cap. Considering there are relatively few Spectre coins, I think this looks to be one of the best bets I've seen in the 5 years I've been involved with these currencies.

If you are looking for a bargain coin with tons of potential, this is as good as it gets. The price is still very cheap.

If all you see is risk and negativity, a year from now you will either have a chance to say "I told you so", or you will be kicking yourself in the ass. Roll Eyes

I'm gonna go ahead and risk an entire $100... Grin