Re: Bitcoin trades the inequity of dynastic power for the inequity of early adoption
Seriously, revans. Don't be a hypocrite. You have a lot of coins and btcbug and I don't have very many. I think it would be in the best interests of all for you to carve up your stake a bit and spread it around so that you don't get tempted to become one of the new elite that you've been talking about. It is only fair.
I also ask others in this thread to quote me and my signature with its respective address so that we can get a time stamp and watch this address. I am curious to see how many donations are sent to that address by those who cry foul with regards to inequality and people not sharing what they have. I have yet to see any donation to that address by anyone. They want to talk the talk, but not walk the walk.
Love your new signature!
I haven't received my share yet, have you?
As I said, you don't qualify as a good cause, merely a lost one.
What was that I was saying...? Oh right!
It's amazing how the commie types start backpedalling and find all sorts of justification not to even out the wealth disparity when it comes time for them to pony up their part.
I really can't believe you would say that about someone in his position. It's clear he is just down on his luck and you could help him out. You have the means.
At least 80% of humanity lives on less than ten dollars a day. Begging is one thing, but acting like someone in the first world really deserves that money is absolutely disgusting, both of you make me sick. If I were revans I would invest my fortune in infrastructure for the developing world, not pathetic forum dwellers who feel sorry for themselves because they didn't achieve overnight wealth.
TLDR: you are a greedy waste of oxygen batcoin.
Interesting you say that. I like your sig too btw:
Quote
The John Self post-mtgoxalypse poverty fund: 14GXJ3Q16PJNNF6v4iyxhvuhacuhvckMym All donations appreciated.
I hope you can say that you are not located in the first world. I am curious though... What makes you think I am located in the first world?
Where is their peer reviewed paper published in a respectable journal refuting these claims?
Moving the goalposts is a dishonest debating tactic. Don't do it if you wish to be taken seriously.
revans seems to be a master at this. Classic evader, and bears all the marks of the reasoning errors that leads to. Not worth debating, from what I've seen so far (haven't trawled this whole thread). But how much do you need to see to get the pattern?
Agreed.
For the record to others in this thread and on the forum in general, my posts and signature were meant to be read as a statement to the proponents of BTC redistribution and not intended to be viewed as begging. Unfortunately, the intended recipients of my statement seem to miss the point entirely. I should have used the sarcasm tags. My most humble apologies.