Quote from: Mendeleev on April 03, 2017, 09:55:02 AM

Quote from: Daparski on April 03, 2017, 09:46:47 AM

Quote from: XbladeX on April 03, 2017, 09:39:12 AM

Quote from: Iabamba on April 03, 2017, 03:33:58 AM

****
#1 is the ICONOMI Investors and ICO Team. Address: 0x29d38fdf26d64fa799276e6615759d27db1f1fcd
****
https://etherscan.io/token/ICONOMI#balances
***

mate are you sure 50m ICN to burn ?
PS: how that devs token are suppose to be locked if they all are in same address ?
How you can find out dev token parameters ?

PS: BTC rise ICN down nothing new chill out ^^

Devs tokens are locked until end of April. They will create and publish the addresses when they will be moved from ICO address

They could be locked on an address containing 13 million. Then we could see they're locked, and verify the vesting etc.

This is what was stated would happen. As XbladeX asked, how do you keep tabs on that if it's all still on the ICO address?

This is pure faith you'd be operating on. You're letting accountability slide. And Daparski, it was YOUR question I linked in the reddit link earlier. This is the answer that was given to you personally. Did you feel assured when Jaka gave that answer? I bet you did. So why would you let it slide now?

True, those 13M ICN could be transferred to different address earlier. The thing is that it's not a 5 min effort. This has to be configured (smart contract, multi-sig and stuff like that, you know), tested, and retested. Or in other words - shifting focus from core development into this.
Priority was releasing the platform for beta testers, which will lead to earlier public release (so you can finally buy ICNX and perhaps be a little bit less bitter).

Call me crazy, but I have the feeling that if they would do that you or someone else would complain about loosing focus on the main goal.

13M ICN will removed from ICO address, I still can't see how this is less transparent doing it before the vesting starts.