Quote from: topesis on April 03, 2017, 07:15:07 PM

Quote from: sergeyzol on April 03, 2017, 04:27:25 PM

Quote from: aisyah88 on April 03, 2017, 03:08:01 PM

Quote from: Matchpool on April 03, 2017, 02:52:11 PM

Hello Matchpoolers
With recent great progress and news in mind I have to deliver some bad news as well and unfortunately deal with Spamming issues

When we started our campaign, we said again and again that we will not give our hand to any spamming and irrelevant posting in order to achieve our 50 post goal and clearly stated that those who will, will get disqualified. As of this morning we had been approached by BTT moderator that indicated us of many instances of such harmful activity. We have been given a serious threat of closing our thread due to the association of those users with our project. Besides having to take those threats and shameful accusations we as a team decided we will not let such users harm what we have been working on for the last half a year and that we won't let those users to risk our project success. We are building a platform for human connections that is mostly build on trust, and this trust was severally harmed today. and thus according to the forum moderators provided lists the following participants will be effective immediately banned from our campaign

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=920630 bitbunni
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=861826 Rastaman2016
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=910928 Sierra82fit
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=909262 wutard
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=858133 Winter1986
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=863474 coszy
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=858136 Dizaster2015
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=861828 Drago2016
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856762 ZlaiaZaia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=907401 one-day0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=926796 Cherry Girl
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=863480 ovvidiy
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=927024 grenade launcher
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856719 Berns
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=854926 Kvazimoda
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=862744 phieiph
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=857700 Lorik
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=734191 horace08122
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=898812 sergeyzol

We are sorry for the inconvenience but are ready to do whatever it takes to protect our community

I think this is a good decision you take, if this is only detrimental to many parties and interfere with all the other participants, there is no problem for everything you want to improve on this issue ..

Hm...can anybody explain me why I'm at this list? Let's take this example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=853083 kamiyama Just look at his posts. Let's ban him too) He is spammer as I am.

This is getting interesting, so spammers are now calling themselves out. I think signature participants are now rushing to complete their 50 posts requirement to qualified for the bounty stake

What do you mean under "spammers are now calling themselves out". You can check my history of posts and find that I've made 45 posts(less or more) before ICO started. I consider team should recheck everyone one more time before disqualification