Quote from: anon24 on April 16, 2013, 08:29:54 PM

the address that paid into the hotwallet has sent money to it before, as well as another BTC24-related account, as i mentioned here

Quote from: anon24 on April 15, 2013, 08:40:21 PM

hotwallet was funded (465 BTC) by 1EhyE3zD47RcCMvGRcEaw83G7qBF6wUT54:
https://blockchain.info/tx/4b1f4714ae21662f3cd7e6d03d3f1f4f94eeff3c6ef460a7536f006e7d320d1d

1EhyE3zD47RcCMvGRcEaw83G7qBF6wUT54 has previously sent BTC to the hotwallet:
https://blockchain.info/tx/fb422bd519657214dbc17c809e9736c2ce139534d92678bc6d12bb1d06756338
https://blockchain.info/tx/7c7402c8366d3024a5d5617462cc76a8d325cc3cefff9710c0ec3f01d69ab37b

and also one of the cold wallets
https://blockchain.info/tx/832b8ed1ec37bd02346e7fd8868e6fac8dd7f53781ef48343eac22e7c79fb38b

it seems very very odd that a non-BTC24-staff member would send HUNDREDS of BTC in several different transactions. what would possibly be the benefit to them?

can you show some evidence of where Simon has talked about contacting the poster of the bug video? it would be quite the coincidence for him to have hoaxed such a specific glitch 2 weeks before it actually started happening. edit: i have just read some of his newer posts on reddit (http://www.reddit.com/user/TAiS46) and seen it mentioned. regardless - i'm not sure i entirely believe him.

also interested in your first part about the BTC withdrawals being explained on the facebook page - i could see nothing there but have read it in the IRC log.

are you speaking on behalf of Simon here (as your title suggests)? your post suggests otherwise...

Yes please clarify - too many junior members here, myself included. I'm optimistic about things but we need to consolidate things - evidence, communication, updates etc