Quote from: pereira4 on April 06, 2017, 12:34:25 PM

So Blockstream wants the bitcoin market to be centralized through a few central companies and hubs?
Nope, that was Bitmain that wanted to maintain centralization of mining hardware and hashing power through their company and hubs.

LOL
check out DCG portfolio
http://dcg.co/portfolio/#b
blockstream
bitpay
BTCC
http://dcg.co/portfolio/#c
coinbase

blah blah blah..
yep all the big names of the blockstream cartels cabin fever mindset of REKTing anything not blockstream sanctioned, as a altcoin are all on the portfolio

P.S
while its the DCG/bockstream cartel that are fearmungering, making deadlines shouting threats, mandatory activations, going soft to avoid node consensus, adding PoW nukes.

the other decentralised peer implementations are just plodding along letting consensus decide.. no threats no deadlines.
and saying no to splitting the network

Quote from: gmaxwell on October 18, 2016, 08:21:30 AM

What you are describing is what I and others call a bilateral hardfork-- where both sides reject the other.

I tried to convince the authors of BIP101 to make their proposal bilateral ... Sadly, the proposals authors were aggressively against this.

The ethereum hardfork was bilateral, probably the only thing they did right--