Quote from: Quantus on April 07, 2017, 12:21:42 AM

The Bitcoin network has ass cancer and its name is Jihan Wu.

I use to think the fake transactions mining pools in chain were creating were to push a false narrative for larger blocks but maybe I was wrong.
Mining pools are using fake transactions to boost efficiency somehow.

"fake transactions to boost efficiency"....

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 04:13:54 PM

just done some quick maths

* stats at time of post

hmm
looks like BTCC and F2pool are the ones making more blocks than their hash %
not the other way round

*for those wishing to question the numbers

antpool being bad guys is DEBUNKED
antpool would have over 40% of blocks with of the 4 pools selected while only having mid 35% hash of the 4 pools selected if they were playing funny games.
in short BTCC are actually solving more blocks then expected.. not antpool.

next
oh the fake tx's to push the need for a feature..
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count?timespan=1year
note the spikes.. one quick drama period in june july..
and then prolonged spikes after october..

hmmm now what proposals needed to be pushed through during those dates..
oh yea, csv in june/july.. and segwit after october.
seems like its the blockstreamists that wanted to create mempool drama to persuade people to think their features were needed... the timing cannot lie

hmm whats next
oh, segwit getting 50% mining signallying a couple days ago which people assume is guaranteed rise in flagging... well
even f2pool was good enough to have morals to admit something

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 06:53:41 AM

meanwhile bitcoins segwit 31% block flagging is only temporary due to a hack expect it to drop back down below 30% in the next fortnight

https://twitter.com/f2pool_wangchun/status/848582740798611456

Quote

Wang Chun‏ @f2pool_wangchun

Someone hacked major mining operations and their stratum had been changed from antpool, viabtc, btctop to us. Our hashrate doubled instantly

10:07 am - 2 Apr 2017