Quote from: bitcoiners on April 16, 2013, 12:47:45 AM

Quote from: Brunic on April 16, 2013, 12:34:14 AM

Quote from: meanig on April 16, 2013, 12:12:06 AM

Quote from: bitcoiners on April 16, 2013, 12:06:57 AM

Like I said dude. Keep yapping. LTC is going to Gox whether you like it or not. LTC does not need BTC. BTC actually needs LTC for security as you've already stated in your OP.

Cheers

Coblee has stated that he's going to keep Litecoin one release behind Bitcoin. How does that make Litecoin not dependent on Bitcoin Huh

Bitcoin is testing the waters for Litecoin. In a way, Bitcoin development is more risky than Litecoin, because if BTC break due to a recent development problem, it will not affect Litecoin.

As an example, look at the last fork that happened to Bitcoin. Litecoin wasn't affected and we know how to prevent it since Bitcoin tested it before Litecoin did.

Amen.... Bitcoin needs LTC more than LTC needs BTC. Period.

And thanks to asics, BTC's need for help from LTC has just quadrupled. There is zero reason for LTC to become BTC's bitch now. It's bitcoiners that need ltc help not the other way around. And unless it's mutual. I see no reason to help them as they've kept us down from the beginning.

Bitcoiners in general need to wake up.

So how does keeping Litecoin one release behind Bitcoin make Bitcoin need Litecoin more then Litecoin need Bitcoin?