Quote from: andron8383 on April 06, 2017, 07:40:55 PM

THey were codding and making analysis that 1MB segwit will make effective 2MB increase.
simple 2MB just increase is damaging for network and would lead to decreasing number of nodes.
Also 2mb block would lead to hardfork and when you have tons of apps stop working.
1MB segwit is solving problems with old soft compatibility.

SegWit will make an effective increase if/when someone jumps on board.

And what "old soft compatibility" issues does SegWit solve? If you're referring to what's described here, that's not really solving anything.

Quote from: andron8383 on April 06, 2017, 07:40:55 PM

To get VISA transfers you need about 1000MB blocks , you can do it in paypal mysql database but not in decentralized network.

Of course one can't. At least for now.

Quote from: andron8383 on April 06, 2017, 07:40:55 PM

And you won't care when Jihad will lift limit of 21m

I guess nobody will care, they can go on with their own altcoin if they so desire, but that's not really on the scope of this subsection of the forum.

Quote from: Holliday on April 06, 2017, 07:43:04 PM

Here is a life lesson for you: Ignore what people say and watch what they do.

Good lesson.

Quote from: Holliday on April 06, 2017, 07:43:04 PM

Mining pool operators clearly have no interest in scaling Bitcoin at this juncture.

Miners have all the interest in scaling Bitcoin. If Bitcoin does not scale it will not survive and miners have vested interest in Bitcoin.

Quote from: AgentofCoin on April 06, 2017, 09:41:36 PM

If Miners are allowed to continue with ASICBoost, Bitcoin
development ends in many fundamental ways.

Well then, it's not hard to figure out what miners will opt for