Quote from: wck on April 09, 2017, 10:05:59 AM

You are showing you are an intellectual giant! Roll Eyes

Optimization is not the same as an exploit.

AsicBoost is an exploit per definition.

Quote from: wck on April 09, 2017, 10:05:59 AM

So? You actually have nothing ...

I have just explained to you in a rather simplistic way, why covert Asicboost won't work with Segwit. Instead of actually learning something, you're shrugging it off as "nothing". Either you're very dumb, or you're on a nice payroll. Roll Eyes

Quote from: wck on April 09, 2017, 10:05:59 AM

-snip-

The rest of your post is worthless.

Quote from: Carlton Banks on April 09, 2017, 10:08:24 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 09, 2017, 07:32:10 AM

I suspect that they will implement confidential assets into either LN or another 2nd layer solution. This is likely where the big money is as Banks spend a lot of money on back office work in settling trades, and have tried unsuccessfully in trying to streamline these processes with blockchain technology.

Further, LN (along with SW) will have so much technical debt, that consultants will likely be needed in order to properly setup LN nodes, and create LN compatible wallets, and the supply of qualified people who can advise companies on how to implement LN will be in short supply, however many of them will work for Blockstream, allowing them to sell their services at high rates -- they will essentially make Bitcoin and LN so complicated so that few people understand how it works.

OK, how come the testnet Lightning software looks pretty easy to use already? I've seen nothing more than a couple of screenshots on this forum, and I could figure out how it worked just from that, without even using it.

So, remind us why highly qualified and expensive IT consultants will be needed to run Lightning nodes for businesses, when I can figure it out from a coupe of screenshots? On an early version of the software?

This is made up fear mongering from BTU fanatics and shills. They keep making these strong statements, yet have no real evidence nor arguments to back them up. You've pretty much destroyed their statements with this response.