Quote from: JuanHungLo on April 09, 2017, 12:13:28 PM

Quote from: UnclWish on April 09, 2017, 11:36:03 AM

Quote from: JuanHungLo on April 09, 2017, 11:11:25 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on April 09, 2017, 09:21:22 AM

Quote from: sikkan on April 09, 2017, 08:29:20 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on April 09, 2017, 08:20:27 AM

Quote from: Fastmartin on April 09, 2017, 08:08:04 AM

Quote from: tkredmond on April 09, 2017, 07:16:14 AM

Is Claymore planning a new release guys?

The miner is already very fast. Difficult to improve speed any more.

But it's need to improve stability.

Ive had zero problems with stability with the miner itself. The only time something goes wrong it's because of me (oc to much)

Keep up the good work claymore!

I tried stock frequinces on 270X and 280X. Same result - miner 12.4 unstable. I read this thread - most 280X on 12.4 unstable. This means that 12.4 need to improve stability.

I can confirm your findings with 280x, I reverted back to 12.0, now I can run at higher intensity, I don't have to use -r 60 to reset miners due to falling hashrates. I tried the -old 1 but it didn't do it for me.

Try 12.2 - for me it gives more speed than 12.0 and stable.

Thanks, I concur. About 2% faster, and so far, stable.

what speed are you getting ?
and what settings
I have 2x 280x sapphire vapor x's
using 12.4 intensity 6 , stock frequencies... seems stable enough...runs days on end
575-580 sols pulling 520-525 watts
cant seem to undervolt with afterburner