Quote from: WildShark on April 11, 2017, 06:19:46 PM

Quote from: CryptoBuds on April 11, 2017, 05:23:53 PM

Quote from: WildShark on April 11, 2017, 05:20:33 PM

Quote from: altheshort on April 11, 2017, 04:03:42 PM

Quote from: o0o0 on April 11, 2017, 01:02:28 PM

Quote from: altheshort on April 11, 2017, 09:48:46 AM

Quote from: o0o0 on April 11, 2017, 01:19:54 AM

Quote from: korvas128 on April 11, 2017, 12:43:20 AM

Quote from: o0o0 on April 10, 2017, 08:58:58 PM

so korvas is telling lies then and whales do get information the public doesnt get about the ionomy vision?

Me telling lies is something you need to decide for yourself Grin

well one of you is telling lies. wildshark says whales get inside info you say whales dont. cant be both.

you shouldnt be telling lies because you acuse others of doing it and that would be hypocritical wouldnt it?

so from that i infer that you are incluned to agree wildshark is a liar? is this correct?

Korvas continually contradicts himself. Here's just one example from only a few days ago where he talks about getting information early. His post history has many others, but to be honest I can't be bothered to trawl through it.

Quote from: korvas128 on March 29, 2017, 12:29:11 AM

And yes I do have a superior knowledge of the situation but

A) If it's not announced by IONOMY it's not for me to say

B) Sharing information if it's not already known to slack users would for various reasons be just plain stupid

by that quote korvas admits ge has info slack doesnt which would be from whale status. there is potential insider trading happening. another red flag.

this is a lie from korvas which means without justification he has no right to acuse others of lies and try to take the moral high ground. thanks altheshort

I agree. To me it doesn't matter if it is legally defined (as yet) as potential insider trading, which is what Sharky appears to be hung up on. In essence, regardless of it's legal definition, the set up whereby they discuss advance information (about matters as significant as delays to products, as they did with Gravity) with a select group who are also the largest holders of the tokens leaves open the possibility that one of the whales may, at some point, choose to act on said information for their own financial gain and to the detriment of smaller holders. It's foolish, and the fact that the team are apparently ok with sharing information in this manner with no formal controls in place shows their naivety, in my opinion. This is crypto; it's largely unregulated. It's idiotic and shortsighted to just trust that the whales won't act out of self preservation because they said they wouldn't.

@altheshort I have access to info prior to the public because I am a Whale and entitled to Alpha test the Ionomy products prior to release... All Founders have access to the info when they Beta testing the Ionomy product.

Thes Whale & Founder services are provided to the Ionomy Team for free!!

Whale and Founder services are free? LIE!

None of the Whales or Founders get paid. They contribute their service for free. Having your input into the platform heard and used benefits the Ionomy products..

Lay off the bottle a bit. Please quote where I insinuated that you got paid as a whale. I dare you. If they paid you to be a whale, they're worse off than what I thought.

What I was saying is that being a whale or Founder isn't free. You must possess a healthy amount of atoms which cost real world money.

You are soooooooooooo far off from correctly addressing any point made in this thread. I know you think it's funny as you think you're trolling. But the fact in the matter is that you look foolish, and since you're a whale, make ION and Ionomy look foolish. And they can look foolish enough on their own, they don't need more help from you.