Quote from: Lorilikes on April 17, 2017, 08:06:20 PM

Quote from: spngebob on April 17, 2017, 05:25:25 PM

Quote from: Lorilikes on April 15, 2017, 04:43:31 AM

I have been working on increasing my credibility and reputation for too long to sell it...

Speaking of credibility and reputation I just checked your blog.
It is full of ponzi sites with your referral link.

Isn't that irony?

No sir that isn't Irony. Especially since you are making FICTIONAL statements.
Once again, I am shocked by the lack of due diligence and ordinary care taken by someone before they make WRITTEN claims. Written claims as damaging as you just spat at me are wasteful and venomous, and you didn't even make sure you were saying something TRUE. That is careless. I don't want to mimick such malicious behaviors, but it is unkind to gossip and throw dirt around.
You may not be aware of how freelance journalism works, but my articles are published across a wide
Variety of sites. The site owners pay me for my content and they have 3rd party advertisers who I am not associated with.
Show me ONE referral link that is attached to my written work. You can try, but I have never mixed the two things. You assumed You would find referral links based on a single visit to an article I wrote, at least that is my guess. It's amazing how fast people state "facts" without any evidence or material to support the vicious things they say.

Quote from: Lorilikes on April 17, 2017, 04:42:01 PM

I hoped to hear opinions about damages that can occur to the true value of trust here in the forum, with this type of shady offer.

Lauda has already explained you here:

Quote from: Lauda on April 15, 2017, 08:09:11 AM

Simply put, two things:
1) He is planning on scamming someone.
2) Standard account farming/shitposting with signature campaigns.

Bitcointalk doesn't really do anything about either one of the case (they do *some* work towards the latter one, but it's highly lenient, inefficient and therefore useless). Read this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1826778.0

What other opinions do you need?

As I said previously, in my note to Lauda, the response was decent up until the point when the thread took a turn towards a totally different topic. I appreciate that you are defending Lauda, since my tone of annoyance was detectable. I understand your loyalty. You could have at least taken some time to make sure your ammo was accurate. The nonsense about my blog. You didn't read my words here, and you didn't really read any blog that led to referrals benefiting me. That was at best an incorrect assumption, and at worst, a lie for no good reason. I will concede the argument out of respect for this forum, and because I can see where this will take me if I allow the relentless nitpicking to get under my skin. I am a happy, talented woman, and I welcome positive, useful exchanges of the mind. I don't want to squander any more energy trying to dethorn a cactus.

[/b][/color]

I am sorry, i thought it was your website, you are just writing blogs for site which is promoting ponzi scams.
My mistake. Please take my apologies. There is really no need to write essay about it.

Second i am not defending lauda but lauda did answer your question, i think you missed it so I point it to you.