Quote from: Lineranger on April 20, 2017, 05:18:59 PM

Quote from: Peeps Place on April 19, 2017, 05:31:53 PM

Quote from: coinplus on April 19, 2017, 01:04:26 PM

I am not sure why directbet is D tough, is there some sort of complaints and scam accusations towards them or do you think they are bad in general? They are one of the oldest and most wagered sportsbooks I have heard of and I would be interested to know why are D and not C or B let alone A.

Now that books are processing payouts so fast, DirectBet lost their advantage of not needing an account. Their odds are bad, may be the worst, and they've confiscated money from approximately 6 players. Not only are winnings confiscated, but the bet amount too in a couple of cases. Bet confirmations can get delayed because of the system that they use. A bet may not get confirmed/rejected until the game goes final.

So the rating based on the odds provided? I just can't see it in the first page about it Roll Eyes

.
The rating should be based on people satisfaction , and i think most people here satisfy on what directbet have done , that is why people is so angry and make a lot of complaint about that bad rating.

There is a point where a book is unplayable due to the odds. DirectBet is impossible to beat long term. Even if their odds are ignored, there are other negatives that play a more significant role in their rating.

Other rating guides list DirectBet at the bottom or near the bottom. There's no getting around their betting system where they confiscate player's funds along with not getting a confirm/reject within a reasonable time on occasion.

It's one thing to cancel a winning bet, it's another to confiscate deposits/wager amount. In DirectBet's case, the wager amount along with winnings.