Quote from: The One on April 19, 2017, 05:15:30 PM

Quote from: yusufjalal on April 19, 2017, 09:36:22 AM

I'm fairly new to this discussion board so please pardon me if my question seems to be quite trivial.

I was wondering why the lightning network hasn't been launched yet?

I understand the SegWit needs to be activated first and miners are essentially centralizing their power for their own interests but for the whole Bitcoin ecosystem, the LN speeds up confirmation times, enables the transfer of really small values and streamlines the process of transferring BTC within the Bitcoin network.

Although there are drawbacks to this extension, I think that the pros outweigh the cons and it should be launched as soon as possible. The politics behind this debate does not contribute anything to the ecosystem and something needs to be done in order for Bitcoin to be a sustainable method of payment in the future.

So can anyone help me understand what's stopping this from happening? In my opinion, I think this is the future of the Bitcoin network and it would be a shame if consensus cannot be reached regarding this topic.

Please discuss.

Too many people are thinking "Lightning Network" is great. How many truly understand it?
Firstly, Bitcoin depends on miners to secure the blockchain, etc. Miners POW rewards will go down over the next 20 years and by then fees will replace the reduced mining rewards. If fees are going to LN "hubs" pockets then who is going to secure Bitcoin itself?
Which begs a question. Why "hubs" and not Full Nodes - users also securing the BTC network but not mining?

Great point.

LN hubs and nodes are on their respective layers of the network.

The fact that we seem to need these 'hubs' should tell people that LN may not be as great as they think it is, because they are a from of centralization and move us farther away from p2p cash.