I would gladly attempt to break the proof of God if there was any. Assumptions and interpretations do not belong to the 'proof' section, they belong to the belief section. As a result, the shit that you keep on posting is not proof, it's something that you heard from Bob Dutko's cds and it needs no 'step-by-step rebuttal' (funny how you overuse exactly these words that Bob Dutko overuses when he's pissed off at people laughing at his moronic ideas). Also, you trying to become a bit aggressive is pathetic and only demonstrates how desperate you are in proving you own the truth. Exactly like any other apologist. My conclusion is and will be the same untill you come up with some decent stuff and stop acting like a bitchy, dumb apologist: fuck off and come back when you really thought about something. We can do this for a long time by the way. It's up to you when you drop the bullshit and start being serious.
I know, I know. If your typing skills are good, and if you have a reasonable knowledge of the language, and if you have the time (or are paid to), you can sit around and blab all day.
The point is, your blabbing is simply that, blabbing. Why? Because you can't seem to come up with any logical step-by-step rebutting of the proof that God exists.
The proof has step-by-step application of the scientific laws and evidences. But you haven't been able to rebut it. Poor baby. And like a baby, all you say is blabber. We're ready. Blab some more.

Dear apologist monkey, you have not provided any proof and you became as annoying as a catholic priest in an orphanage. Get the fuck out of here before I hitchslap you and your whole cult of cat ass lickers and child molesters. I advice everyone to simply ignore or just insult this dumb monkey until he leaves or at least comes up with some new things instead of trying to repeat the same shit hoping that will make it true.