Quote from: roadbits on April 20, 2017, 09:02:19 AM

Quote from: mirakal on April 20, 2017, 08:34:50 AM

Quote from: dossantosleite on April 20, 2017, 06:19:45 AM

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I guess it is risky on sports betting, that is my understanding because every time set a line like the ATS, the odds are like 1.90 or -110, so that means they are putting juice of 10%, in dice the house edge is like 1% which is very low compared the juice you will have to pay when you bet wins.
However based on chances, you have a bigger chance of winning since you can analyze the data while in dice it is purely based on luck.

I think No sports betting is not riskier than casino games. Whatever happen in sports betting it depends on our knowledge. If we take time and do accurate analysis, we will win our bet. And whenever the odds is below 1.1 or 1.2 this is safe odds in sports betting. In casino games, as you told it is completely based on our luck. No analysis and strategies will not help you to win your bet. So for me, casino games are risky games.

Playing games in casino is very low in probability of winning because you are monitored by the system of the casino, they have very sophisticated camera that even the character of you cards or dice can be seen meaning they are in control its up to them if they want you to win or unless your lucky enough that even if they manipulated the game but still you winning. While betting sports you have the assurance of 50% probability of winning and the plus factor is you know statistic of the players or the team that you are betting.