Quote from: mindrust on April 22, 2017, 11:05:55 PM

Quote from: franky1 on April 22, 2017, 11:02:27 PM

Quote from: mindrust on April 22, 2017, 06:48:57 PM

Those two don't have enough wisdom and education to rule over bitcoin.

"rule over bitcoin"?

no one should rule over bitcoin.
as others have said there are dozens of different implementations that can all run side by side on a diverse decentralised peer network.
thats what all the different implementations want a single network of diverse decentralisation..
only core oppose this and want a TIER network

if you think that only core should "rule over bitcoin" then take a step back from the keyboard have a cup of coffee and actually think about the words you are saying

I agree 100 percent. That's why i don't support BU. Ver and Wu do want to rule over bitcoin, that's clear as day. If you think Bitcoin won't be a centralized piece of shit after BU becomes thee "bitcoin", then you must be high.

Luckily even if they get their fork, nobody will care because what they get will be another pump&dump ultra scamcoin.

I support the dude who created bitcoin in the first place and if the current dev team are the descendants of him, then i agree with them as well. I don't agree with a bitcoin angel guy or a chinese turd.

So basically you only support Core because the developers are "white"? Your judgement is clouded by nationality. Just focus on the offers.
Core - Segwit, poor idea and no guarantee of higher capacity as it requires users to use segwit. Roughly 5000 lines of codes. Follow by LN - crap idea.
BU - dynamic mb decided by miners/market - crap idea. Flextrans, better than Segwit.

Common proposal by users - raise the blocksize to 2mb for now.