Quote from: nutildah on April 23, 2017, 08:05:01 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 23, 2017, 08:02:56 PM

Quote from: nutildah on April 23, 2017, 08:01:01 PM

Quote from: franky1 on April 23, 2017, 05:44:42 PM

if you think its a roger vs the world or a china +roger vs .. then please actually stop reading the reddit scripts and do some proper research

I already told you, I rarely ready Reddit. And when I do its not about BU or BTU or whatever ripoff of bitcoin's name you want to call it. If the hardfork takes places, Roger will have stepped outside of the consensus mechanism. He will no longer be a part of "bitcoin" but "Bitcoin Unlimited." He also owns the bitcoin.com domain. Please explain to me how by changing the content of the site to promote Unlimited he would't be severely undermining the entire legitimacy of bitcoin.

how about because Bitcoin is decentralized? And no one group (Core) can tell everyone else what is the one true version of Bitcoin?

Yes, bitcoin is decentralized. So will Bitcoin Unlimited be should the hard fork happen. Because let's face it: there's no way a soft fork is happening. So nobody will be able to tell Rog & Co. what they can or can't do. I'm just saying changing the content of the bitcoin.com site to reflect Bitcoin Unlimited promotion would be a really low blow, if indeed he goes through with the hard fork.

Well you are assuming there will be a network split...and you're also assuming that the small block version with a smaller proof of work chain will still get to call itself "Bitcoin"...which is certainly questionable. So lets not get ahead of ourselves.