Quote from: CoinCube on April 25, 2017, 06:14:39 PM

Quote from: miscreanity on February 14, 2017, 04:07:22 AM

Quote from: iamnotback on February 12, 2017, 02:16:17 PM

What is actually the worst possible outcome is to have one strategy, religion, or culture adopted by everyone.

This is the point I disagree with. I think we both agree that the optimal way to increase degrees of freedom for individuals is to allow and enable instead of controlling. A universal strategy is an essential foundation that enables freedom. Without that, we have the situation that is developing now with varying viewpoints where some sets are progressing toward destruction and others are being dragged into declining entropy. Competition can take place when there is room for growth but on a globally saturated scale, nobody wins.

Reproductive strategy is likely to become essentially irrelevant for humanity, possibly within our lifetimes. It seems inevitable that our existing biological bodies will give way to different forms that will carry us off-planet. At that point, allowing and enabling all individuals to thrive in a constructive environment becomes paramount. What then is the protocol that keeps that freedom from becoming destructive? Of course, my thinking is that the protocol is outlined in the Christian bible.

The following two (relatively) short videos may be of interest regarding previous discussion:
The moral argument for God
Why Does God Allow Evil?

The theory in this thread if correct provides a possible mechanism for Genesis 2:17 at least in regards to Homo sapiens.

For it is the father will to give you the kingdom said our lord Jesus Christ. God desire for us to be what we can be from the beginning of creation. If you want to be a machine you can be by the power of the mind and technology development. But remember this is the last age we are, and in this last age we expect many revolutionary theory to come up.