Quote from: Abiky on May 03, 2017, 06:37:50 PM

Quote from: electronicash on April 28, 2017, 04:31:59 PM

agree. founders are greedier than ever. it could have been distributed fairly. there's classic though. i'm not a fan of classics either but its still has value. to me these are all just plain coins like just like XMR. if you have to invest to an anon coin take those who have been distributed fairly and cheaper ones like XSPEC.

SDC could have been good but was delisted on polo lately. Cheesy

Exactly. That is the problem with most altcoins out there, as their greedy developers and/or founders tend to either pre-mine or tax the cryptocurrency for their own gains. The result of this is failure, as it limits the ability for the cryptocurrency to grow.

Everything about ZEC is great, as it introduces a revolutionary technology that improves our financial privacy. If the ZEC team had a fair distribution without founder's reward, then I think that it would've been a huge success and become widely used among everyday people.

The battle between several anon coins like Dash and Monero, make it really hard for ZEC to get a grasp at becoming higher in market cap and popularity, as previously mentioned coins, have a fast-paced development and innovation.

Nevertheless, it might be interesting to see how ZCash's price would be after the founder's reward period is over. Just my opinion.

So it needs more users and develop further and better than other anom coins.