Quote from: NiceHashSupport on April 29, 2017, 09:22:51 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 29, 2017, 09:11:18 AM

Quote from: NiceHashSupport on April 29, 2017, 09:02:37 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 29, 2017, 06:33:28 AM

Quote from: zawawa on April 29, 2017, 04:01:55 AM

Excavator's API has a pretty interesting minimalist design philosophy, which is refreshingly different from sgminer etc.
I would imagine its merits would become clearer as we add more features and algorithms and develop helper applications that take advantage of it.
As for raw performance, I will do everything I can to make it a top-notch OpenCL miner.
Now that I have more time and resources, I can try things that were previously impossible for me, and I am really excited about that.

so is excavator a closed source product using opensource algos? ...

yet no opensourced gpl licence adherence? ...

and you are 'happy' to work on a system that breaks the licensing agreements? ... if of course that is the case - which it seems likely it is ... though i could be completely wrong about this - i have yet to see - thats all ...

im interested to know how this free windows based miner stands up to that test - especially since nicehash can buy almost any dev they please in the current btc market ...

who owns nicehash btw? ... as much as the nicehash service is pretty awesome service by most standards - there is little information about where when and how it was established and who owns it ... i use it - and so does our company - as it IS a good system that has been created here ... but outstanding questions have yet to be answered here as those ive raised - and im more curious than i am anything else ...

be that as it may - congrats on the 'job' anyway mate ... nicehash certainly know how to pull in the good devs ...

#crysx

Excavator does not and will never violate GPL licenses when it comes to including work/optimisations of other dev's mining code. Currently, it has equihash and pascal algorithms, both developed and based entirely on MIT licenses of various people. zawawa is putting in his own pascal implementation and his own equihash implementation (based on silentarmys MIT license). We are also talking with several devs to include other popular algorithms such as decred, lyra2rev2, lbry and we are aware that if we go down that road, authors of these codes need to make special non-GPL code for us and that costs - and we are fully prepared to pay for that.

and so it is ...

im fully aware of that ... and as such - i needed confirmation - which you have readily given and not withheld ...

this is rare in this day and age of crypto - so one can expect such questions to arise from time to time ...

tanx for your openness and honesty with the response ...

im still wondering ( this is merely a to amuse my curiosity more than anything at all ) who is the actual owner of nicehash and its servers / segments? ... its a comprehensive and complex system that has been created - and a financially successful one at that - even though the infrastructure does cost ... so i ask this question to satisfy my curiosity as to whether this is a single person - single entity - or a conglomeration of people who actually own and continue to grow this behemoth os a mining system ...

kudos to whoever and whatever has set this up ...

#crysx

It will be revealed soon, but so far I can say that it is two legal companies and a bunch of people and of course, expanding to more and more people.

tanx mate ...

#crysx