Quote from: actmyname on October 08, 2018, 12:08:02 AM

Quote from: marlboroza on October 08, 2018, 12:03:48 AM

Quote

many of the ratings lauda left are not for someone that is a scammer using any reasonable definition

Can you please list all accounts with such rating? I don't want to tag wrong person. Thanks!

This is an overarching statement but I believe it's ill-advised to tag those that are on the SMAS list. There were a number of users that were tagged because of this and the reason given was something along the lines of "likelihood of having alts" rather than a concrete reason.

Simply being blacklisted is not something that should warrant a tag.

There were also a few opinionated negs that were sent out, to which I did not echo.

Ok, when you quote only second part it looks stupid Roll Eyes

Quote from: actmyname on October 07, 2018, 09:31:26 PM

EDIT[3]: All 301 done.

I am at 100 at the moment. Not all are tagged, there are many threads and posts I have to take some time to read. Connected accounts are worst because I can't really tag 1 account and leave other accounts not tagged. Speaking off, you missed few accounts here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg30515128#msg30515128

I would tag them myself but that spreadsheet looks close, it says "access denied" and search button doesn't help, I can't find many addresses.
I have found 2 address which are connected to these accounts:

Hipster999 #260 Address : 0xCCE979a54Eb8000CBC516Dd9565b9552Da6c0C1d
Symphony_fr #239 Address : 0x8e564ff6Df82D74ca2dF61914E9fa48bfe182569

But search button went crazy! It showed me wrong result:

Quote from: horace08122 on May 02, 2017, 10:48:00 AM

Bitcointalk username: horace08122
ETH address: 0xCCE979a54Eb8000CBC516Dd9565b9552Da6c0C1d

Quote from: Samadur on April 25, 2017, 07:06:06 AM

Bitcointalk username: Samadur
Waves or ETH address: 0x8e564ff6Df82D74ca2dF61914E9fa48bfe182569

Well that is very strange.

Hopefully, this will make my previous post more...understandable.