Quote from: franky1 on May 02, 2017, 04:42:37 PM

i was actually symplifying things without going into waffle for the benefit of the "one paragraph concentration spam" people of reddit/twitter

Regardless, you are wrong about the sigops.

Quote from: franky1 on May 02, 2017, 04:42:37 PM

plus gmax didnt dbunk anything. he just done what you usually do.. "wrong because word twist + insult"

He did debunk it by making such a statement as your claim is ludicruous. If I were to get the author of Segwit in here to tell you that you were wrong, you'd still write "he didn't debunk anything" nonsense.

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on May 02, 2017, 05:46:31 PM

If you're concerned about decentralization, SPV Fraud Proofs are better than ever: https://bitcrust.org/blog-fraud-proofs

This is nonsense, as you'd expect it from a paid baboon. SPV Fraud Proofs are far from being practical and safe enough to alleviate the dangers of SPV wallets.

Quote from: anonymoustroll420 on May 02, 2017, 06:00:01 PM

I had never heard of this fraud proof implementation. Interesting.

They are not ready yet. Hypocritically, the BTU supporters bash something that has been extensively tested for months but praise something that is new as safe just because it fits their agenda. Roll Eyes