Quote from: classicsucks on May 02, 2017, 12:27:08 PM

So a few coins with very low volume and a small number of nodes needed a soft fork to increase (not capacity?), but Lightning compatbility? And this is proof of... what exactly? I think it's largely pointless, since coins the size and traffic of Litecoin can easily do hard forks.

The amount of volume and number of nodes is entirely irrelevant to this. Segwit has proven itself both on testnet and real world networks. On the other hand, EC has proven itself nowhere.

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on May 02, 2017, 02:46:07 PM

So what do you want then?

Either such people are paid or they have been drinking a lot of the propaganda kool-aid. I can't possibly explain this otherwise (assuming user is not a troll).

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on May 03, 2017, 01:34:22 AM

Blocksize has little to do with miner centralization.

It has everything to do with miner centralization. Another display of faulty knowledge.