Quote from: bananos on May 03, 2017, 05:26:54 PM

Quote from: dbkeys on May 03, 2017, 04:09:29 AM

Quote from: juanp11 on May 02, 2017, 04:24:34 AM

Quote from: Noolz39 on May 01, 2017, 06:31:32 PM

Dev answers:

Quote

We'll be trading on SUPER net soon. But my view is that liaising with polo and other exchanges is the top priority for this month at least, before the next online summit. I dont trade, so it will have to be others that do that drive that. Let's see how far we get. :slightly_smiling_face:

What I think what happened was an accidental transaction got orphaned, and one of the exchanges synced to the wrong chain causing a bit of confusion. But I speculate. It would be great to find out the reason for temp suspend of the wallet. Then maybe we can fix the issue.

I hope wallet suspension is temporary and btm is not delisted. Polo have said that they wont delist us as long as there is active development. I stand ready to volunteer to help develop the coin, if it keeps gonig. Hopefully, there will be more clarity as the month progresses. Then we can so an online summit in June, the next roadmap, technical goals, outreach to new communities and marketing material ...

There is actually a lot of technology for marking already built, so its just a case of getting it (nearer) to production quality.

could have decentralized identity, storage, search, marking and payments all from a desktop client, with lots of very good content, in the next 6 month roadmap. All the pieces are there for that, it's a case of putting it together and making a good user epxerience

I read the stuff on the hard fork rules... unanimous (or near it) consent kills any fork, which seemed like a naive thing to even suggest.

Additionally, the thing about the "accidental transaction" and the "wrong chain" has me a bit worried, sounds like a fork or a f-up, which no one is really solving.

The Dev (melvincarvalho) also says he stands ready help develop the coin, if it keeps going, not exactly sounding like he is into it, at the moment.

Then, you think about Bitmark Inc and I start wondering if Bitmark, as we know it, now, is just hoping to ride the coattails of the Chinese project, Bitmark Inc with their funding announcements last year and other news they had.... I checked to see if there was a new wallet on bitmark.io and it is still Bitmark Core 0.9.4.0 beta despite the recent news of releases.... I guess we will see stuff "Soon" since

Quote

There is actually a lot of technology for marking already built, so its just a case of getting it (nearer) to production quality.

could have decentralized identity, storage, search, marking and payments all from a desktop client, with lots of very good content, in the next 6 month roadmap. All the pieces are there for that, it's a case of putting it together and making a good user epxerience

Blind faith is just as bad as trolling... it would be nice to see some alpha builds for the general public since nearer to production quality seems like they should have that....

I rather think it's the other way around ... the Chinese bitmark.com is riding _our_ coattails.

The hard fork criteria outline proposed by Melvin Carvalho make good sense to me. As long as a majority of the community agree that it is a good think, I don't think it need be 100% unanimous.

Why you dont want to add masternode with POS+POW algo? You are lost in 2016-2015

The idea of stake being required to create greater returns for staking miner nodes (Master Nodes) is very interesting; I believe this concept was pioneered by Dash.

The concept of Proof-of-Stake to earn "interest", so coins staked for a definite period of time (or number of blocks) earn a certain return is well-liked too. This would change the basic setup of Bitmark as non-inflationary, but if the interest wasn't excessive it should not be a problem. What return on staked coins seems reasonable to you ?

I also like the idea of Proof-of-Stake to enable voting on issues affecting the coin and taking decisions, or setting policy parameters, but all this would have to be elaborated in detail. Do you have more specifics in mind ??