Quote from: iram3130 on May 03, 2017, 06:01:06 PM

Quote from: South Park on May 03, 2017, 05:34:24 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on May 02, 2017, 09:47:15 PM

Quote from: dossantosleite on April 20, 2017, 06:19:45 AM

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I was thinking a lot about this. I think sport bet is more risky because 95% on dice means 95%, and there are lots of factors that will effect on sport game such as injuries, weather, fans, bad day etc, not to mention bookie can make mistake.

I dont think that makes it more risky it makes it more variable, while events could happen that could reduce your chances of winning the opposite can also happen, the star player of the other team may get injured, or the referee makes a mistake in your favor.

Yes, there are many factors on which sport betting will be decided but some sports will favor one side in the basis of that factor, like duckworth-lewis in cricket, it'll be harder to predict who will win but I feel sports bets is less riskier than casino because you won't have much strategy in casino, you need stronger luck there.

I agree, sports betting are less risker than casino games, because sports betting needs skills to predict the correct result while casino games you need to be lucky to hit the right numbers and make profit. But the house edge is everywhere, on any kind of gambling game and it always lower our profit when we win, but that is the cost to have a good platform service to let us bet...