Quote from: achow101 on May 04, 2017, 02:12:37 PM

Quote from: dinofelis on May 03, 2017, 12:17:13 PM

I thought that Satoshi gave the github keys to Gavin ?

No. Satoshi did not even have the project on Github originally. Gavin took over the project after Satoshi disappeared since he was the most experienced and active contributor at the time. I have found no evidence for Satoshi handing anything over except for Gavin's own statements. There is no indication from Satoshi that there was any plan for a "line of succession".

Ah, nice to know !

Quote

A precise definition of the consensus rules are necessary. Everyone must be following the exact same consensus rules, with its bugs, intricacies, and undefined behavior, in order to not have any accidental hard forks. The 2013 accidental hard fork is an example of such failure of different consensus implementations. On paper, all nodes were following the same rules. But in implementation, one version of the implementation had a bug which in turn caused an accidental chain fork. If everyone follows precisely the same rules, then this cannot happen. The only way for everyone to follow precisely the same rules is for every node to be share the same consensus implementation.

This is actually only true for mining pool node software, as they are the only ones producing the block chain. All the others can only download what the miner nodes produce or stop and not download it. So the de facto protocol is the protocol that is compatible with the consensus chain that is produced by the miners ; whether that corresponds to any written document or not and whether that corresponds to any non-mining node or not. If all miner pool nodes follow the same protocol, then only one chain is produced, which you can read with a "compatible browser" or which stops when that "browser cannot understand the only chain around". Here, browser is any full node, or light wallet.