Quote from: Dorky on May 05, 2017, 04:43:38 PM

The truth is, I don't even know what math you are talking about nor did I ever (you can quote me if you like) argue about your math.

You can't respond to the logic without responding to the math. So since you are not responding to the math, then your argument has no merit.

The reason is because Bitcoin can't magically become something which the economics dictate that it can't be. Bitcoin was designed with a given economics that dictate what it is and will progress to.

Quote from: Dorky on May 05, 2017, 04:43:38 PM

Bitcoin as I personally understand it, will be BOTH regulated and centralized, and nobody will be exempted from it, not the $millionaires and not the $billionaires.

Bitcoin will be the Mark of the Beast.

Fewer still (among the few) see it as a digital/online tracking/surveillance system/network.

You will not buy nor sell without the Mark of the Beast, regardless of the fee that you are paying.

The 666 outcome can happen without violating what Bitcoin is designed to be. Bitcoin is designed so the shadow elite have a better gold to avoid regulations in the coming NWO system. The minnows won't be allowed onto this unregulated escape. And the $millionaires (dolphins) will be bleed to death by egregious transaction fees to be able to transact on this privileged system.

The masses (like you and I) will be pushed off chain (LN on Litecoin probably) regulated systems where the 666 outcome will take place.

Blockchains are not able to be regulated by nation-states because the blockchain is global and nation-states can only regulate what is inside their borders. Don't conflate blockchains with centralized exchanges. Whereas, off chain LN "banks" can be regulated by the existing banking regulation systems, because most people will have an account on one of these Mt.Box "banks".

What I have explained is the most counter-intuitive and thus according to Szabo's Law of Dominant Paradigm, my math analysis is the correct one, as it is the least understood by most people, i.e. what I have explained is only known by the few (myself only?) who are expert enough.

@Dorky, you should learn to pay attention and stop missing out on my expertise. I say that not as a loud display to be boastful. I am simply trying to help you and others stop being blind. But as I wrote upthread, I realize this is a futile activity on my part and I am disengaging. Hey I offered you one final chance to open your eyes.

Quote from: anonymous from Crypto.cat chat

The 666 scenario would make sense if Bitcoin sustains an injury where it is thought to be defeated, yet comes back to function as the elite platform which is given back authority by Litecoin

That is a possible Biblical interpretation.