Quote from: the_end_is_near on May 05, 2017, 08:48:57 PM

You can't respond to the logic without responding to the math. So since you are not responding to the math, then your argument has no merit.

The reason is because Bitcoin can't magically become something which the economics dictate that it can't be. Bitcoin was designed with a given economics that dictate what it is and will progress to.

1. What you said in 1st sentence is utter nonsense. Math is valid only after you know the whole picture, and use math to explain it. You don't try to use math on something you understand fractionally and claim your math holds the truth.
2. The 2nd sentence of yours is also nonsense by implying you already know the future based on Bitcoin's math.

The 666 outcome can happen without violating what Bitcoin is designed to be. Bitcoin is designed so the shadow elite have a better gold to avoid regulations in the coming NWO system. The minnows won't be allowed onto this unregulated escape. And the $millionaires (dolphins) will be bleed to death by egregious transaction fees to be able to transact on this privileged system.

Now this sets me apart from you. You don't know the shadow elites do NOT need bitcoin to avoid regulation. The fact that you think they need bitcoin to avoid regulation (or need anything to avoid regulation itself) means you are not really a savvy person to discuss about the shadow elites. I never say 666 outcome will violate bitcoin. Bitcoin is mark of 666. There is no need for self-violation.

The masses (like you and I) will be pushed off chain (LN on Litecoin probably) regulated systems where the 666 outcome will take place.

You will be wrong on this. It won't take long for this to play out. By then, you will disappear from the forum.

Blockchains are not able to be regulated by nation-states because the blockchain is global and nation-states can only regulate what is inside their borders. Don't conflate blockchains with centralized exchanges. Whereas, off chain LN "banks" can be regulated by the existing banking regulation systems, because most people will have an account on one of these Mt.Box "banks".

This implies you do NOT understand how the shadow elites will use bitcoin/blockchain to regulate us. And what you are saying about people getting regulated because they have account on the Mt. Gox "banks" is utterly untrue. It shows your ignorance.

What I have explained is the most counter-intuitive and thus according to Szabo's Law of Dominant Paradigm, my math analysis is the correct one, as it is the least understood by most people, i.e. what I have explained is only known by the few (myself only?) who are expert enough.

I have no interest to look into your math. Only you have interest in your own work.

Quote

Given opposing opinions with equal evidence in their favor, the less popular opinion is more likely to be correct.

You can bet my opinion is the least popular and most against by most people.

@Dorky, you should learn to pay attention and stop missing out on my expertise. I say that not as a loud display to be boastful. I am simply trying to help you and others stop being blind. But as I wrote upthread, I realize this is a futile activity on my part and I am disengaging. Hey I offered you one final chance to open your eyes.

@iamnotback, what is your expertise? A PhD in math? A PhD in critical thinking? A psychic? You may think I need you to survive the future but that's like I saying you need me to survive the future. Both are equally BS. But at least I am not the one uttering the BS. I don't know how to make a retard like you understand. If I say I don't need your expertise, you may think I am stupid/foolish. But then if I say the exact same thing to you (that you need my expertise), you may say I am an idiot. But then if I say I need your expertise, you will say I am smart. So can you see where this kind of one-sided thought process of yours is heading? Utterly foolish, boastful and egoistic. You need my guidance. But you need to submit to me first.

Quote from: anonymous from Crypto.cat chat

The 666 scenario would make sense if Bitcoin sustains an injury where it is thought to be defeated, yet comes back to function as the elite platform which is given back authority by Litecoin

That is a possible Biblical interpretation.

That clearly shows you don't really know the shadow elites, nor the Bible, nor bitcoin. Do you even know who/what is the Beast? You are more dumb than I thought.

Bitcoin is the ONE AND ONLY digital currency of choice. Not litecoin. Not monero/dash. Not even ethereum.
You can contradict me all you like with your smartness, but its not like you really know, or going to succeed.